NOV - Infinite Jest

November review for Book Riot's Read Harder 2018: Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace, 2005. [assigned book you never finished]

My friends and I started reading Infinite Jest a few years ago, but our little book club petered out. It sat on my shelf for a long time, until this category! I do love the language, the way DFW plays with words, but it was difficult to get through, especially in the way I've been reading, snatches on my commute or drowsy in bed. That being said, I am glad I finished it.

How does one really summarize Infinite Jest? It is a postmodern encyclopedic novel, a behemoth of a text that I used as a headrest on more than one occasion. It has been described as "meta modernist" and "hysterical realist." It's set in a halfway house and a tennis academy, features junkies on both sides, told in a stream-of-consciousness similar to that popularized by Virginia Woolf, but very very clearly written and created by a man. There is an Infinite Jest wiki that was wildly helpful throughout my reading, because god knows the footnotes were just as cryptic as the book itself.

So much of this book is figuring out DFW's language/shorthand etc. He uses footnotes for wildly differing reasons, from defining the technical composition of drugs to parenthetical interviews to asides to fucking defining POV but there's nothing that is like "when I say demapped it means killed or suicide" like most normal footnotes. The truth (Truth) in this book is constructed, rather than reported (page 1048, footnote 269). The footnotes can be used as construction, in various ways: through asides (264), definitions (308), parentheticals (325), and research (304), among others.

A friend's review of IJ, immortalized

I am glad to have read this book, I am stubborn enough to have finished it, but I am equally glad that it is over. David Foster Wallace is a very talented and complicated man, to be sure, and a genius with wordplay, and he is truly worth studying.